2015-02-07 18:45 GMT+01:00 Tim E. Real <[email protected]>: > On February 7, 2015 12:41:28 PM Tim E. Real wrote: >> On February 7, 2015 03:31:20 PM Robert Jonsson wrote: >> > Same goes for the audio strips. There are plenty of useful settings >> > that I think should be shown in the mixer, including a default eq (I >> > was thinking.as a start we could embed a ladspa plugin with a *.ui >> > configuration as we do for the TAP Reverb). >> > I was discussing this with Mathias (hi Mathias!) the other day and a >> > default compressor and auto leveller (as exists in the cubase mixer) >> > would also be awesome improvements. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Robert >> >> Some many months ago when I was discussing stereo panning >> and strips in general with Paul and folks on LAD, he said >> Ardour uses several different 'plugins' for the actual pan and >> volume sections of Ardour's strips. >> The idea was "the right plugin for the right job": >> If it is a stereo strip you need a slightly different configuration >> of 'panning' and 'volume' controls than with a mono strip. >> >> So I had an idea similar to yours, that we embed a plugin, >> with our own *.ui file, into the strip section basically from the top >> of the volume slider all the way down to the bottom of the pan knob. > > Addendum: > Note, this /could/ even include the meters themselves ! > Since the audio signal is passed through the plugin. > >> >> Different 'plugins' are placed there according to exactly what the >> user wants there. >> >> For stereo strips we could have a choice of: >> A volume slider and a two panners. >> A volume slider and a panner and a 'blend' control. >> Simply four volume sliders - no panner. >> And so on... >> >> For example there is a ready-made plugin from Invada (I think) - >> the stereo front-end strip plugin. It's got blend controls. >> I actually currently use this plugin as a rack plugin. >> So you can see, it would be nice if such features were actually >> embedded in the strip itself. >> >> Again, I think there were some conceptual and implementation >> issues, but I was certain it could be made to work.
Interesting ideas, atleast from a technical perspective, most of the strip could be customizable in this way. :) >From a practical perspective it might be to overdo it if everything was customizable, but still. I'll try to get back to this in a while see if I can produce a mock up of the functionality I think I would like to have.. not now though. Regards, Robert >> >> Tim. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, > sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your > hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought > leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a > look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Lmuse-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
