I don't think we need to impose those sort of restrictions. I personally use sylpheed for patches and GMail for everything else and they have no problem sorting things out.
The ODP mailing list covers both discussions as well as patches, and HTML is useful for the former. The onus should be on those who have problems with this to upgrade their tools rather than sending everyone else back to the 1980s. On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Mike Holmes <mike.hol...@linaro.org> wrote: > All, > > A topic that comes up occasionally that affects some mail tools like > outlook is that html email on this list makes it harder for some folks to > process patches. > > I use mutt specifically to avoid using a fancy email client for all my > patch download/send work, it is powered by coal/steam and would work fine > on a 1970 VAX but there you go. > > Anyway, does anyone object to having mailman reject HTML mail ? One up > side is that I will not waste time blocking offers of cheap watches and fax > services from the list :) > > On the other hand I will miss bullet lists and the color red when I am > grumpy. > > Mike > > -- > Mike Holmes > Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group > Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs > "Work should be fun and collaborative, the rest follows" > > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
