Why the caution?
We can have a 3.0, a 2.1 and son on.
Nobody expects we should stick forever with a version.
On the other hand, we were releasing in beta for ages now.
What are the reasons you don't want a 2.0 stable?
On 2 Jan 2014, at 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
Make it RC or another beta IMO. Once 2.0 is out you cannot unhinged
that bell.
Gary
-------- Original message --------
From: Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
Date:01/02/2014 02:46 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
Subject: Next release of 2.0
I am trying to find a bit more time to work on Log4j again. I see
quite a few issues that I would like to address and think I will need
about 2 weeks to complete them so I am tentatively targeting the
middle of the month for the next release. The question in my mind
is whether the next release should be 2.0-RC1 or just 2.0.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
