On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Frankly, Gary, I don't understand the hesitation.
> We started talking about a 2.0 GA release six months ago. Surely that
> should have been enough time to familiarize yourself with the APIs and
> raise any concerns.
>
> I understand that the 2.0 release is a big step but I also agree with
> Christian that if unforeseen issues come up we can address them in upcoming
> releases. (And if we find we've made a terrible mistake and need an API
> change, then so be it...)
>
> How about everyone marks outstanding Jira tickets that they really want to
> address before the 2.0 release (with the issue target version), and release
> the 2.0 GA when these are all fixed?
>

Hey, it's a volunteer community process, and we all have our opinions ;) I
just stated mine is all.

Feel free to call a vote when you see fit. It's all good.

Gary


>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What tweaks do you have in mind? API changes?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Christian Grobmeier <
>>> grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why the caution?
>>>>
>>>> We can have a 3.0, a 2.1 and son on.
>>>>
>>>> Nobody expects we should stick forever with a version.
>>>> On the other hand, we were releasing in beta for ages now.
>>>>
>>>> What are the reasons you don't want a 2.0 stable?
>>>
>>>
>>> You've got it backwards ;)
>>>
>>> I do want a stable 2.0. I, personally, am not 100% familiar with 100% of
>>> the API and I am not sure that the API is stable. There are a LOT of
>>> _public_ APIs in Log4J. Once 2.0 is out, these are set in stone.
>>>
>>> There are also a couple of tweaks I'd like to do. People are using log4j
>>> now in beta form. Another beta/rc will not hurt. But once 2.0 is out, we
>>> are set.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2 Jan 2014, at 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Make it RC or another beta IMO. Once 2.0 is out you cannot unhinged
>>>>> that bell.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>>> From: Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>>>> Date:01/02/2014  02:46  (GMT-05:00)
>>>>> To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
>>>>> Subject: Next release of 2.0
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to find a bit more time to work on Log4j again.  I see
>>>>> quite a few issues that I would like to address and think I will need 
>>>>> about
>>>>> 2 weeks to complete them so I am tentatively targeting the middle of the
>>>>> month for the next release.   The question in my mind is whether the next
>>>>> release should be 2.0-RC1 or just 2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>>>> @grobmeier
>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to