Did you redirect standard out to a file, or did you let it write to the terminal, when running the Log4j2AppenderComparisonBenchmark?
I just tried both, and that gives you a significant 5-10x difference. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > First, my thanks to the many people who gave helpful advice and feedback > on how to measure Log4j response time on this list some time ago. > > We're about to start the Log4j 2.6 release. > If anyone is interested, a preview of the garbage-free logging manual page > is here: http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/manual/garbagefree.html > and a preview of the updated performance page is here: > http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/performance.html > > Feedback welcome! > > Remko > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* mikael.stal...@magine.com Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
