I used no special config for the JMH benchmarks, so the ConsoleAppender writes to the terminal. Perhaps it is a good idea to suggest redirecting to a file in the text that accompanies these benchmark results. Or add a benchmark result for how fast ConsoleAppender is when redirected.
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> wrote: > Did you redirect standard out to a file, or did you let it write to the > terminal, when running the Log4j2AppenderComparisonBenchmark? > > I just tried both, and that gives you a significant 5-10x difference. > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> First, my thanks to the many people who gave helpful advice and feedback >> on how to measure Log4j response time on this list some time ago. >> >> We're about to start the Log4j 2.6 release. >> If anyone is interested, a preview of the garbage-free logging manual >> page is here: >> http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/manual/garbagefree.html >> and a preview of the updated performance page is here: >> http://home.apache.org/~rpopma/log4j/2.6/performance.html >> >> Feedback welcome! >> >> Remko >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >> > > > > -- > [image: MagineTV] > > *Mikael Ståldal* > Senior software developer > > *Magine TV* > mikael.stal...@magine.com > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com > > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply > email. >
