Hi Pier,
JSR47 is still in the public-review stage. Doesn't that mean that officially
alterations are still possible? Cheers, Ceki
At 00:43 13.06.2001 +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
>Ceki Gülcü at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Here is a written critique of JSR47, the logging API shipped with
>> JDK 1.4:
>>
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html
>>
>> If you agree with its contents, then you are encouraged to send a
>> personalized request to
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> asking them to adopt log4j as the logging API shipped with JDK
>> 1.4. Please cc: me if and when you choose do so. Thank you in advance.
>
>No matter how many requests they get, it's too bad, but this is for sure not
>going to happen, as what's delivered in the platform strictly must adhere to
>what the JCP produces. Apache is a member of the JCP for the J2EE platform,
>but not for the J2SE, where JSR47 falls, that's why we weren't asked to
>vote.
>
>Anyway, knowing Graham (he's a very reasonable person), I bet that for the
>next revision of the API you will be asked to participate :) Not all hope is
>lost... :) :)
--
Ceki Gülcü
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
