Isn't that what JCP is for?
;-)

-Marc


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lutz Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:55 PM
> To: 'Log4J Users List'
> Subject: RE: Log4J vs. java.util.logging
>
>
>
>
> great point.  Hopefully someone at Sun is listening.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Eugelink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:26 PM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Log4J vs. java.util.logging
>
>
> Oh, and let me add another opinion to my own mail. I think
> that adding more and more functionality to the JVM (what Sun
> is doing now) is not a good thing. I prefer a lean mean core
> "engine" and addon JARs. Want SSL? Add SSL.jar. Want logging?
> Add logging.jar. Want RDBMS? Add JDBC.jar.
>
> I'd vote for putting energy in a better classloader, one that
> is able to handle different versions of the same JAR file in
> the classpath (like DotNet... autch).
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> TBEE wrote:
>
> > Let me, as a log4j user, give my 2 cents. I looked at the
> Java 1.4 > logging classes and decided they were inferior to
> log4j. Since log4j is > an external JAR, it will not only be
> available in JDK1.4 but also in > 1.5, ... and you can
> already use them in 1.3. So log4j is the way to go.
> > > Tom
> > > > Matthias Petersen wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> >> I saw in the 1.4 JDK that there were new classes
> introduced concerning >> logging, which seems to be a base
> for Log4J. When I take a look at the >> class hierarchy of
> Log4J, it is not a subclass of those JDK logging >> classes
> (I think the reason is that Log4J is older than the 1.4 JDK...).
> >>
> >> So, what will happen with Log4J in the future ? Will it be
> a subclass >> of the Java 1.4 logging classes or will it go
> in a different direction ?
> >>
> >> I think that the Log4J classes are much better than the
> 1.4 Java >> classes, but what will happen if those Java
> classes will become the >> standard for logging ? Or will
> Log4J be a part of the JDK somewhere in >> the future ?
> >>
> >> Your answers are very important for me, because I have to
> decide if my >> company is using Log4J or if we need to
> enhance the 1.4 JDK logging >> classes.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Matthias
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >> Matthias Petersen ms management systems gmbh
> >> Krokamp 29
> >> 24539 Neumünster
> >>
> >> Fon: +49. 4321. 9995-49
> >> Fax: +49. 4321. 9995-41
> >> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
> This message and any included attachments are from Siemens
> Medical Solutions USA, Inc. and are intended only for the
> addressee(s).  The information contained herein may include
> trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential
> information.  Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing,
> copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you received this message
> in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to
> receive it, please promptly delete this message and notify
> the sender by e-mail with a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank you
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to