On 08/15/2011 07:26 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I think it is important for us all, that we do have a single place with > the code to discuss - and once we have enough people with write access > it won't be necessary to think about any other place than svn for this. > > The "hg or git clone of svn" model works very well for the odd case of > people who want to contribute larger patches but don't have write access > themselves - which should be the exception.
And it makes sense in cases where people work together on a bugfix without the need of spamming the svn log with stuff that doesn't work. Right now the most useful log4net that people use is the svn trunk. We shouldn't break it! Indeed the history how a single patch evolves is not at ASF, but since patches should be sent to the mailing list (patchbomb extension) and discussed there (mbox extension) it is not that far from ASF at all. Please correct me if I'm wrong. -- Dominik Psenner ## OpenPGP Key Signature ################################# # Key ID: B469318C # # Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C # ##########################################################
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
