On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:52:27PM +0000, Marcel Grunauer wrote: > >Hmmm ... I'm sure that Quantum::Superpositions and Quantum::Heisenberg > >should be used in there. > > I'm not sure Quantum::Heisenberg is the right name for that. Heisenberg's > uncertainty principle is about something different, isn't it? /me confesses to not having read Quantum::Heisenberg -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david Let he who is not a semi-literate half-wit cast the first brickbat
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Mee
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Paul Makepeace
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Fowler
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Roger Burton West
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Rogaski
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
