On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:17:44PM +0000, Tony Bowden wrote: >On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 07:30:37PM +0000, Mark Fowler wrote: >> Then I got to thinking that maybe you want to develop Tie::Sub::Timeout >> (which isn't really right, as you're not tieing) which allows you to >> replace subs with other subs for a short period of time. >Sub::Approx::Timeout ? ->new(period => 'quite a while'); -- Roger Burton West -/- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Mee
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Paul Makepeace
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Fowler
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Roger Burton West
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Rogaski
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
