On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 07:30:37PM +0000, Mark Fowler wrote:
> Then I got to thinking that maybe you want to develop Tie::Sub::Timeout
> (which isn't really right, as you're not tieing) which allows you to
> replace subs with other subs for a short period of time.
Sub::Approx::Timeout ?
Tony
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Bowden | Belfast, NI | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.tmtm.com | www.blackstar.co.uk
make me laugh make me cry enrage me don't try to disengage me
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Mee
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Paul Makepeace
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Fowler
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Roger Burton West
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Rogaski
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
