Tony Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 07:30:37PM +0000, Mark Fowler wrote: >> Then I got to thinking that maybe you want to develop Tie::Sub::Timeout >> (which isn't really right, as you're not tieing) which allows you to >> replace subs with other subs for a short period of time. > Sub::Approx::Timeout ? /me runs off and hides behind sofa. This sounds like a ~~~ to me. Have another ~ if you find a "practical" use.
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Paul Makepeace
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Fowler
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Roger Burton West
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Mark Rogaski
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Cross
