On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 06:22:50PM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote: > How do you see this working? Some people get munged, and others not? > What happens when a person gets a non-munged reply-to, they reply to > author instead? This then mandates a pile more rules for people who > start getting spurious unfiltered replies in their inbox? Sounds > annoying... Perhaps I'm missing some link here.
Well, little me is subscribed to n mailing lists, both with mailman and majordomo. I notice no difference as a user, btw. My main 'problem' is that,for one of the mailman lists, mutt replies to the sender but for all others (london.pm included), mutt replies to the list. And I always fofget that when I reply to that one list. It would be really kewl if I could set all my mailman lists to reply-to-lists and then they could have the more standard reply-to-sender as default for those who do not override the default... I think that is what people are talking about - I may be wrong - that is what *this* user would like to be able to do with her mailman subscriptions... ;-) -- Natalie S. Ford ................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.natalie.ourshack.org ...... http://natalief.livejournal.com
