<snip> > > As you mention, the venue is excellent and I would encourage everyone to > > be wholly positive about this lest they decide it's not worth the > > aggravation. > > Don't get me wrong, I think Yahoo! are entitled to put in place whatever > policies they want.
you think signing in is bad? you try typing from behind a gas mask. > However, I don't think it's in anyone's interest to be wholly positive > about a policy that may at some stage prohibit someone from going to a > meeting that they might like to or everyone else might like them to. > Someone fretting on a mailing list is hardly going to push the Yahoo! > office manager over the edge in a mad rampage and ban London.pm, is it? definitely not - it's a pain in the ass, but as mentioned many times, unfortunately due to the late notice i figure there wasn't time to rearrange, i'm sure mark will be looking elsewhere for next time. a > > Perhaps you think I shouldn't mention it just because I'm not in a > position to offer anything better? > > Jasper >
