Hi all,
> On Oct 3, 2022, at 8:37 AM, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > > > [As wg-member] > > I think the draft should include a table of all top level TLVS as rows and > for columns we have > > - "Implicit Single TLV Only" (e.g., no key info) > - "Implicit Multi-TLV Only" > - "Explicit Single TLV Only" > - "Explicit Multi-TLV-Allowed" > > This draft then would *explicitly* cover the existing "implicit" cases and we > have the table to point at to be precise about what we are talking about. I have completed this effort. Rather than burden the draft with this, I have created a spreadsheet and am sharing a link to the sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VWQHsJTq7JRUVdRVcRd_QYYyY_LiOX7H0ZKn8feRZo4/edit?usp=sharing There are numerous proprietary TLVs that I cannot evaluate. I have ignored them. I am human. I expect that I will have missed several things. If you have a correction, please unicast me. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
