Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> writes:
I simply turned your question around and asked: should conforming
implementations be penalized?
[LES:] Are you claiming that the absence of an explicit statement
regarding support of MP for a given TLV is equivalent to a
prohibition against sending them (which fails basic logic)?
Why did we explicitly define multi-part TLVs?
I agree we appear to not making any progress here. Perhaps it would be more
productive to have a discussion in a different forum like an interim or
something similar.
Thanks,
Chris.
[as wg-chair]
Gah, I meant "as wg-member"! However, the suggestion of a different forum could
probably come from the chair hat as well. :)
Thanks,
Chris.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
