>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Hume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> i guess we'll see. obviously, you DON'T need time to Andrew> represent change. in fact, the preferred mechanism is Andrew> normally a state change in an FSM. time, because of its Andrew> other properties, tends to confuse the issue (mostly by Andrew> humans who bring a fair bit of baggage with it). Andrew> but the FSM story is another tale. You're absolutely right; time doesn't need to be included as an independent variable in order to represent change. It needs to be encoded somewhere so that you can understand what happened. I find that this is where things get mushy; getting administrators comfortable with what is going on is the tricky part... -nld _______________________________________________ lssconf-discuss mailing list lssconf-discuss@inf.ed.ac.uk http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/lssconf-discuss
