On Sunday 28 October 2007 06:40:53 Scott Balneaves wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:07:34AM +0530, Sudev Barar wrote: > > I think ltsp3.x/4.x is something that needs to co-exist with ltsp5.x > > since the reuse of older hardware attraction is only possible with > > 3.x/4.x > > Why do you say that? I've booted ltsp5 on a 250mhz box with 64 megs > of ram.
I was actually wondering the same thing; I was under the belief that the attraction of LTSP is the ability to use (much) older PC hardware as thin clients. I was not likign the idea that LTSP5 requires more powerful hardware (and I hope that never becomes the case....) -Alan Murrell ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
