On Sunday 28 October 2007 06:40:53 Scott Balneaves wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:07:34AM +0530, Sudev Barar wrote:
> > I think ltsp3.x/4.x is something that needs to co-exist with ltsp5.x
> > since the reuse of older hardware attraction is only possible with
> > 3.x/4.x
>
> Why do you say that?  I've booted ltsp5 on a 250mhz box with 64 megs
> of ram.

I was actually wondering the same thing; I was under the belief that the 
attraction of LTSP is the ability to use (much) older PC hardware as thin 
clients.  I was not likign the idea that LTSP5 requires more powerful 
hardware (and I hope that never becomes the case....)

-Alan Murrell

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to