Oliver Grawert schrieb:
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 25.09.2009, 12:56 +0200 schrieb Stefan Below:
>   
>> Oliver Grawert schrieb:
>>     
>>> comparing the speed of NX with its insecure and outdated snapshot of the
>>> old included xlibs with recent implementations of xcb is somewhat like
>>> comparing netscape 2 with firefox 3.5 :)
>>>       
> ...
>   
>> And i think the most important think is "user experience". What should i 
>> tell the users? 
>>     
> tell them you install the known fix immediately and be done ?
>
>  
Already did that. helps a bit, but it is still choppy.
>  
>> to say you cannot compare an old library/system with the 
>> new one? .... thats silly .... than the new library is not as good as 
>> the old one or its programmed for a different purpose.... (and the your 
>> comparison with netscape2 and firefox 3.5 does not fit here)
>>     
> the new lib is written to support the old features as well as future
> ones, ltsp is just a user of xorg, we dont write it, if xorg developers
> make a decision to change something, please dont blame ltsp developers
> for that (or call them silly) without the hard work sbalneav, stgraber
> and others did put in to find a fix for the breakage thats only seen in
> networked X connections the bug wouldnt have been fixed, please honor
> their work.
>
> the xlibs in NX are several years old and lack security updates, they
> wree written in a time where hardware was a lot less powerfull, how is
> it wrong to compate these libs with a browser that was written at a time
> when hardware was less powerfull and which doesnt see any security fixes
> anymore ?
>
>   
I dont't blame or call any developers 'silly'. what i tried to say is 
that the comparison lacks a bit. Yes, the nx package uses _old_ libs , 
but they do the same like the new ones (what we need for ltsp/nx).

>> I really like the LTSP and Linux, but sometimes it makes me sad to see 
>> that the development goes in the wrong direction.
>>     
>
> which would be the tright direction in your opinion, stick with
> unsupported upstream software, leave security holes open. stay faster
> instead of fixing issues in new software but have support from
> upstream ? thats what ltsp4 did and it got to the point where the ltsp
> developers had to drop the ball simply because they couldnt cope with
> keeping the software safe and in a supportable state.
I know that this discussion is coming up every few month, but the 
problem is that you need for ltsp5 much stronger hardware to get the 
same user experience than with ltsp4 due to the fact that ltsp5 is using 
the standard components of the underlying distro.
What do we need for thin computing(on client side)?
 In my opinion we need a tiny, stable os, that is maintained,used  and 
supported somewhere else and fitted with extra packages for ltsp.
i already did some experiments with openwrt and i think it could perform 
well.....

Well, i know thats  all matter of time and manpower to get it work,and 
thats the biggest problem :-)

> if you really want the released ltsp5 versions to be bugfree, there is
> only one thing you can do to help out: 
> TEST DEVELOPMENT RELEASES !!!
>
> help to identify bugs before the release so the bugs dont even go out to
> the users. if you dont do that i really dont see from where you take the
> right to complain about bugs that werent even introduced by ltsp but
> actually fixed by ltsp developers and for which exactly these ltsp
> developers offer bugfix packages to make your life easier.
>
> ciao
>       oli
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
>   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to