As Rüdiger suggested, I'm pretty certain the issue is the graphics
driver, but I don't know how to fix it.  It could even be the ethernet
driver, but graphics seems more likely.

I'm using nvidia-current because it's the only driver that will work
at all.  I would have installed a brand-new nvidia driver from their
installer if I could.  But, the nvidia installer needs to see the
hardware, particularly the card, in order to install.  So, I can't do
it on the server inside the chroot (tried multiple times to trick
it... no luck).  Since the chroot is mounted read-only to the client,
the install can't work there either -- the driver can't actually
install anything.

I still think memory issues wouldn't show up so specifically in
certain programs given certain actions, and reliably among multiple
clients.  Next time I have a few days to spare, tho, I could try
memtest just to be sure.

It is probably worth pointing out that I couldn't even use an
installation of Ubuntu directly on these clients -- at least not with
11.04.  I don't recall if I tried 11.10.   When I could get it to
install, there would be graphics issues.  Actually... I think I had to
use an old monitor attached via VGA to the video card to get the
Ubuntu install CD to even display.  I finally installed a specific
version of RHEL and the HP drivers just to prove that the monitor and
card actually worked.

Life on the bleeding edge is like that:  this morning I tried
upgrading the clients chroot to kernel 3.0.0-14 and the clients
stopped working.  Had to revert to 3.0.0-12.


On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Jeff Siddall <n...@siddall.name> wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 11:29 AM, Lachele Foley (Lists) wrote:
>> I'm really confused about why changing X_RAMPERC fixed one problem,
>> and if so, why it didn't fix another.
>
> I don't really know what is happening in your case but I can give you a
> datapoint:
>
> I run dozens of Atom based thin clients using various Intel GMA graphics
> chipsets and 1 GB RAM and only rarely have clients freezing or logging
> out and even that appears to be unrelated to memory since, in general,
> most of the RAM on the clients is free.  Here is an example:
>
> top - 09:41:29 up 6 days, 10:36,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.07
> Tasks: 120 total,   1 running, 119 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
> Cpu(s):  1.5%us,  0.7%sy,  0.0%ni, 97.9%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,
> 0.0%st
> Mem:   1020524k total,   905952k used,   114572k free,        0k buffers
> Swap:        0k total,        0k used,        0k free,   830204k cached
>
> Note that 830204k is cache (which means it is free for processes to use)
> and another 114572k is entirely free.  All told only about 7% of the
> RAM, or about 76M, is being used by processes.
>
> This is on K12Linux running LTSP5 with no localapps running so YYMV but
> unless you are running a lot of local applications I can't imagine you
> are running into memory exhaustion.
>
> I would try putting memtest on a USB stick and letting it run for a day
> or two (on the clients) to make sure you don't have any memory
> corruption issues.  After that start looking at driver and network
> connectivity issues.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Jeff
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net



-- 
:-) Lachele
Lachele Foley
CCRC/UGA
Athens, GA USA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to