On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Pierre Chapuis <[email protected]>wrote:
> strings in the dependencies table so if we allow tables
> to mean alternative dependencies it would not break any
> existing rockspec, would it?
>
Hisham checks rockspecs thoroughly, so we can't just sneak in a feature ;)
However, it is again time to discuss a new version of the rockspec format.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
