Yeah, I looked at it as 2.9.4 has been around a while, I've been using it for a while, and I assume others have as well, and we haven't had any complaints (few exceptions).
I hope people aren't waiting for a "last call" to provide feedback. It should be continous. When it dies down, I assume issues are shaken out and things are somewhat vetted. ~P ---------------------------------------- > From: digyd...@gmail.com > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:48:02 +0300 > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > To avoid misunderstanding... > > Community==all Lucene.Net users > > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing > against all projects using Lucene.Net > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how > RavenDB uses it? > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 ( > https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2 > ) > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case. > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hey All, > > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks > > left to take care of? > > > > ~Prescott > > ----- > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı. > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011 >
