I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn. I'll check next time I push something to svn.
But both of those items have made it to the mirror. - michael On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know how often github mirror is updated. > These are the original locations > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ > 2.9.4g > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_ > 9_4g/ > > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing. > > Thanks, > DIGY > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for > potential > memory leaks > > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly > signed patch applied to it? > > 2011/9/6 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> > > > To avoid misunderstanding... > > > > Community==all Lucene.Net users > > > > DIGY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing > > against all projects using Lucene.Net > > DIGY > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at > how > > RavenDB uses it? > > > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 ( > > > > > > https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2 > > ) > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case. > > > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready > to > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some > tasks > > > left to take care of? > > > > > > ~Prescott > > > > >
