Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass. We are now running long tests to measure memory usage among other things.
There is one show stopper tho. There was a patch sent by Matt Warren for Spatial.Net, that doesn't seem to be in. See http://groups.google.com/group/ravendb/msg/7517f095810c48f3 Any chance you can get it in to 2.9.4? On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>wrote: > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and > will let you know how it went. > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon < > mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > >> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from >> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn. >> I'll >> check next time I push something to svn. >> >> But both of those items have made it to the mirror. >> >> - michael >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated. >> > These are the original locations >> > 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ >> > 2.9.4g >> > >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_ >> > 9_4g/ >> > >> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > DIGY >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] >> On >> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM >> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 >> > >> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for >> > potential >> > memory leaks >> > >> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag >> I >> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly >> > signed patch applied to it? >> > >> > 2011/9/6 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> >> > >> > > To avoid misunderstanding... >> > > >> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users >> > > >> > > DIGY >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM >> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' >> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 >> > > >> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of >> testing >> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net >> > > DIGY >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com] >> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM >> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 >> > > >> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look >> at >> > how >> > > RavenDB uses it? >> > > >> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 ( >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2 >> > > ) >> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's >> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case. >> > > >> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Hey All, >> > > > >> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for >> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are >> ready >> > to >> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some >> > tasks >> > > > left to take care of? >> > > > >> > > > ~Prescott >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
