I don't know how often github mirror is updated. These are the original locations 2.9.4 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ 2.9.4g https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_ 9_4g/
Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing. Thanks, DIGY -----Original Message----- From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for potential memory leaks Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly signed patch applied to it? 2011/9/6 Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> > To avoid misunderstanding... > > Community==all Lucene.Net users > > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org' > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing > against all projects using Lucene.Net > DIGY > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4 > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at how > RavenDB uses it? > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 ( > > https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2 > ) > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case. > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hey All, > > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks > > left to take care of? > > > > ~Prescott >
