I've gone back and forth on whether I think we're ready for graduation or not. I had always felt like we weren't because the project isn't as active as I'd like it to be. However, I think I've been looking at it wrong. We've got a good enough process and we *have* made progress. If anything, graduating might add an urgency to the project when things get slow, since we'd be an official project and more would be expected. I don't think anybody wants the project to end up like it did last time, before we gave it a reboot.
I'm up for starting this process, but I don't want it to take any time away from getting 3.0.3 released. Thanks, Christopher On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote: > As a mentor, it's my job argue with Itamar a bit. It's not just > semantics. We don't incubate projects indefinitely. I think that you > all are good to go. The transition is not very much work. Please do > draft a resolution and conduct a vote in the community, and we can > then take it to the incubator PMC. > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com> > wrote: > > IMHO, whatever brings more attention to the project, and I'm not sure > > graduation is what this project needs right now. In the end it's just > > semantics. > > > > I'd focus those efforts on getting more work done and having more > frequent > > releases. Hence our proposition to sponsor dev, which still stands. > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> > >> I think with the addition of two new committers we've made some progress > >> in community growth. I think we'll have 3.0.3 out the door soon - are > there > >> any other items we think we need to address before looking to graduate? > >> ~P >
