On Wednesday 14 June 2006 11:17, Ronny wrote: > Can we compare and contrast on technical qualities. > I know this might hurt most of you I think Cisco is slow > at technology and greedy shihhhhh!I read :-) . > Putting all the advantages that come with Linux in mind.Can > Cisco compete perfomance wise and not to mention the speed > of growth of technology ie Linux,USB can see they have tried > to integrate USB technology for storage purposes yet other > guys are using them for communication interfaces
Cisco has support for USB tokens on most of their current entry level and enterprise routers. Even the new NPE-G2 for the 7200-VXR chassis has USB support (as well as the smaller 2800's). It depends really - the Linux kernel switches traffic in route-cache, which is okay for servers but can be a problem for passing 100's of megs of traffic, let alone gigs. > This is changing my thought and might as well do to you. > Have time for this though some is wrong and advise :-) . > *http://www.imagestream.com/Cisco_Comparison.html Again, please refer to the NANOG archives for a real-life experience of Image Stream. Mark.
pgpSvO2WvSbIb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
