Thanks will comeback to you.
Ronny
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
--Isaac Newton
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 11:17, Ronny wrote:
Can we compare and contrast on technical qualities.
I know this might hurt most of you I think Cisco is slow
at technology and greedy shihhhhh!I read :-) .
Putting all the advantages that come with Linux in mind.Can
Cisco compete perfomance wise and not to mention the speed
of growth of technology ie Linux,USB can see they have tried
to integrate USB technology for storage purposes yet other
guys are using them for communication interfaces
Cisco has support for USB tokens on most of their current entry
level and enterprise routers. Even the new NPE-G2 for the
7200-VXR chassis has USB support (as well as the smaller
2800's).
It depends really - the Linux kernel switches traffic in
route-cache, which is okay for servers but can be a problem for
passing 100's of megs of traffic, let alone gigs.
This is changing my thought and might as well do to you.
Have time for this though some is wrong and advise :-) .
*http://www.imagestream.com/Cisco_Comparison.html
Again, please refer to the NANOG archives for a real-life
experience of Image Stream.
Mark.
|
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
