On Saturday 17 November 2007 22:37, Hari Kurup wrote: > The address space used at the UIXP is not RFC 1918 space > :-)...
The reason I mentioned RFC 1918 was because the exchange point address space is to be used for infrastructure only, and not to provide non-exchange point services. Also, ISP's should not carry exchange point NLRI inside their core. So in case RFC 1918 became a suitable option based on the above limitations, the reasons I provided were to nullify that option as well :-\. > There is no reason the IXP cannot be a data center > (like KIXP). Data centres are not typically dusty places where your CPU fan has potential for just becoming dead-weight in the long run :-). It's IP... it can follow his server even when it's still in his rack at work/home, where it's clean and all that :-). Cheers, Mark.
pgpg1eDhOpmtF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
