to be honest, i had looked at the web-interface as well, and not deduced the CIDR prefix from that either.
On Saturday 17 November 2007 13:33:47 Hari Kurup wrote: > Ernest - (AfriNIC) wrote: > >>> I posted the list of afrinic IP's before, and one of the subnets they assign > >>> to uganda is 41.220.0.0. > >> This should be 41.220.0.0/20 not the entire /16. > >> That is why I advised you to use the web interface, Mr. Battenberg. > > > > If he insists on using the ftp stats, they contain the "network" address > > and a "host count". Other parameters like CIDR prefix length or subnet > > mask can then easily be deduced. > > Well he used it and did not deduce the CIDR prefix correctly from the > raw data hence I gave him an easier option. > But like they say, there are many ways to kill Mr. Dog :-) > > -- > Hari > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > -- rgds, Reinier Battenberg Director Mountbatten Ltd. +256 782 801 749 www.mountbatten.net _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
