Good points Wire...

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Wire James <[email protected]>wrote:

>  I have read through the comments made on this subject and indeed while I
> concur with the fact that some polishing is needed on the way forward with
> the .ug, there are facts we can not keep hiding away from. What are those
> facts?
>
> 1. The .ug is a national resource that can not be left in the hands of a
> private company for good. While CFI has done a good job in getting us where
> we are today, the time has come for a change in the administration of this
> resource. The Government needs a say however small or big. The civil society
> and private sector also deserve a say too and that is why the proposal of
> forming a body that brings together the different parties is a good idea. As
> to whether we are copying what has been done elsewhere in E.A, that is a
> non-issue. For all the threats of Govt regulation, I say UCC go ahead and
> have a say in this .ug issue.
>
>
a ccTLD has never been a national resource unless a country adopts it that
way. With all due respect, a ccTLD is put out there for anyone in the
corresponding country to take on and do with it as they please of course
observing a few RFC.

Unless the GOVT (read UCC) wants total control of the go.ug or gov.ug, I see
no correlation of .ug and it being a national resource. Correct me if I am
wrong.


-- 
Mike

Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in
a million chances happen 99% of the time.
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to