At 11:18 PM 8/12/2005, you wrote: >Arthur wrote:
> >I'll stand on my F naturals, which both MO and ES turn to F sharps. > >My original printed edition did have the F naturals, and that was the >point on which Erik criticized it. Eventually, in our discussions on >RMCG, you were the one who told me (Remember, all of this is still >on-line in the Google archives of RMCG) that Erik was right and I was >wrong, and I should put the sharp back in. As I explain in my on-line >article, I eventually made the change not because of what you and >Erik said, but for my own reasons. I any case, the critical apparatus >attached to the edition clearly spells out the available choices and >each guitarist can make up his or her mind without being spoon-fed by >you or by me. All of the above is of course exactly 180 degrees off. My original 1984 paper edition had the F#, and that is the point Erik criticized it. (Takes a bit of reflection to get untangled from Arthur's obfuscations...) The current on line edition has the F natural and for Arthur to say that it is a sharp is not only a misrepresentation, but an outright lie. Check it out for yourself: http://www.orphee.com/schulz-1.pdf Matanya Ophee Editions Orphe'e, Inc., 1240 Clubview Blvd. N. Columbus, OH 43235-1226 Phone: 614-846-9517 Fax: 614-846-9794 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.orphee.com http://www.livejournal.com/users/matanya/ To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
