Well, we may never know, but it probably is like "ground"
   d
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: Sean Smith <lutesm...@mac.com>
   To: lute <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Sun, February 12, 2012 9:51:49 AM
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Dumps and Downes
   The dumpes question seems to have settled down again but I have to
   wonder, could they simply be a lullabies? The repetitive, hypnotic
   character is like no other kind of composition and they never really
   get what you could call exciting. I'm thinking of the earlier ones
   pivoting on C and Bb; not the bergamask variations. (They may have
   gotten the lumped in with dumps due to their seemingly endless strains
   and may even be as hypnotic but they don't have that "Gooo tooo
   sleeeep" feel.) I just looked at the two Goodnights in Dd 2.11 and they
   are both just beautiful and boring --a great trick to pull off and if
   done at their best you should never hear any applause!
   That many appear by J. Johnson in service to the queen suggests they
   had a use perhaps in the same sense as dances for dancing and songs for
   engaging poetry.
   Just my cent and a half.
   Sean
   On Feb 9, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Leonard Williams wrote:
   Bernd sent me the following (I don't think it got to the whole list):
   ------ Forwarded Message
   From: "Bernd Haegemann" <[1]b...@symbol4.de>
   Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:38:51 +0100
   To: "Leonard Williams" <[2]arc...@verizon.net>
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Dumps and Downes
   I have only 2 dumps and thought them to be quite humpty-dumpty, but
   read
   this:
   **
   Dump.
   A type of instrumental piece occurring in English sources between about
   1540
   and 1640. Some
   20 examples are known, more than half of them for lute and most of the
   remainder for
   keyboard. The word is of uncertain derivation. In the 16th century it
   denoted mental
   perplexity or a state of melancholy. The musical dump was variously
   described as 'solemn and
   still', 'deploring' and 'doleful'; there is some evidence to suggest
   that it
   was the English
   equivalent of the French deploration or tombeau, a piece composed in
   memory
   of a recently
   deceased person.
   16 dumps are listed in Ward (1951): all are anonymous except for two by
   John
   Johnson. A few
   more are included in the catalogue in Lumsden, among them a relatively
   ambitious work in the
   Marsh Lutebook (IRL-Dm Z.3.2.13) labelled 'Dump philli' (ed. in Ward,
   1992,
   ii, no.4; the
   piece is unlikely to be by either Philip van Wilder or Peter Philips as
   was
   formerly
   thought). The earliest known dump, My Lady Careys Dompe (in GB-Lbl
   Roy.App.58; MB, lxvi,
   1995, no.37), is familiar as an early example of idiomatic keyboard
   writing.
   It is written
   over an ostinato bass, a simple alternation of tonic and dominant
   (TTDD).
   Most other dumps
   share this type of construction, using similar bass patterns (DTDT,
   TTDT) or
   standard
   grounds such as the bergamasca, passamezzo antico and romanesca. Some
   later
   examples have
   different formal schemes, such as The Irishe Dumpe in the Fitzwilliam
   Virginal Book (ed.
   J.A. Fuller Maitland and W.B. Squire, Leipzig, 1899/R, rev. 2/1979-80
   by B.
   Winogron,
   no.179), which is a simply harmonized melody of three strains. An
   isolated
   late example is
   An Irish Dump, an instrumental tune printed in Smollet Holden's A
   Collection
   of Old
   Established Irish Slow and Quick Tunes (Dublin, c1807) and reproduced
   in
   Grove5; Beethoven
   arranged it for voice and piano trio, to words by Joanna Baillie, in
   his
   collection of 25
   Irish songs woo152 no.8 (London and Edinburgh, 1814).
   Bibliography
   J.M. Ward: 'The "Dolfull Domps"', JAMS, iv (1951), 111-21
   D. Lumsden: The Sources of English Lute Music, 1540-1620 (diss., U. of
   Cambridge, 1955)
   J. Caldwell: English Keyboard Music Before the Nineteenth Century
   (Oxford,
   1973)
   J.(M.) Ward: Commentary to The Dublin Virginal Manuscript (London,
   1983)
   J.M. Ward: Music for Elizabethan Lutes (Oxford, 1992)
   Alan Brown
   ***
   best wishes
   Bernd
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "Leonard Williams" <[3]arc...@verizon.net>
   To: "Bernd Haegemann" <[4]b...@symbol4.de>
   Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 11:23 PM
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Dumps and Downes
   > Bernd--
   >      Nothing from Grove's--or else I didn't notice the citation.
   >
   > Leonard
   >
   > On 2/8/12 3:43 PM, "Bernd Haegemann" <[5]b...@symbol4.de> wrote:
   >
   >> Dear Leonard,
   >>
   >> I suppose someone sent you the article from Grove's dictionary?
   >>
   >> best wishes
   >> Bernd
   >>
   >>
   >> ----- Original Message -----
   >> From: "Leonard Williams" <[6]arc...@verizon.net>
   >> To: "Lute List" <[7]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 1:49 AM
   >> Subject: [LUTE] Dumps and Downes
   >>
   >>
   >>>      What can the collective wisdom share about a style of
   composition
   >>> called down(e) or dump?  I have four of these: two from Holmes (ff.
   12, 94)
   >>> and two from Marsh (ff. 124, 426).  Questions:  Are they basically
   divisions
   >>> on a ground?  Does one follow a strict rhythm with them?
   >>>      I enjoy playing (in some cases simply attempting) these.  Are
   there
   >>> others, perhaps by different names/titles?
   >>>
   >>> Thanks and regards,
   >>> Leonard Williams
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>> To get on or off this list see list information at
   >>> [8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   ------ End of Forwarded Message

   --

References

   1. mailto:b...@symbol4.de
   2. mailto:arc...@verizon.net
   3. mailto:arc...@verizon.net
   4. mailto:b...@symbol4.de
   5. mailto:b...@symbol4.de
   6. mailto:arc...@verizon.net
   7. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   8. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to