There are paintings of the interiors of artists' studios that show
   props used in pictures:
   busts, skulls, ornate chairs, drapes and sometimes (iirc) musical
   instruments.  Such
   props are even listed in tax inventories, I understand.
   Art historians have traced some from painting to painting, e.g., an
   ornate three-leg chair.
   Instruments might serve, as perhaps is the case in this painting,
   as symbols of the harmonious nature of love.  The over reaction of the
   sitters in
   this painting recalls, at least to me, the depictions of various
   emotions illustrated in old treatises on acting.  "Hamming it up" seems
   to have been part of theatrical performances
   in the past. So, one might argue, this painting may have been intended
   as a serious depiction.  Ad the angles of the
   two instruments, as Gary notes, may have been foremost in the artist's
   plan.
   On the other hand, musicians would surely demand precision in the
   depiction of fingerings, holding the instrument, etc.,
   because their professional competency might otherwise be questioned.
   Interesting discovery, David.  I must visit your web page more
   frequently.  Arthur


   On 11/24/15, Martyn Hodgson<[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

   Very interesting David.
   It may be simply a fashionable couple wanting to be portrayed
   performing but in fact unable to play a note! Perhaps the painter who,
   as you point out, might be thought to have known better was laughing up
   his sleeve...
   Or perhaps, and maybe more likely (the painter might not have wished to
   be later seen to make fools of his rich clients), they had insisted on
   this sort of pose (it certainly looks very stylised especially with the
   young lady's eyes turned to heaven etc) and their insistence overcame
   any scruples the painter may have expressed about depicting them
   actually playing. In short, the very act of posing for the picture was
   the statement rather than the playing of music.
   regards
   Martyn
   __________________________________________________________________
   From: David Van Edwards <[2]da...@vanedwards.co.uk>
   To: [3]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 10:50
   Subject: [LUTE] Another lute picture?
   Dear All,
   My Lute of the Month series has dwindled to lute of the Year these
   days! It's because I've mainly been writng them for the Lute
   Society's
   newsletter, Lute News, now it has a nice full colour cover.
   But here is the latest, as it were more public, example up on the web
   at
   [1][4]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
   I hope you find it fun! As usual please email me any corrections or
   comments
   Best wishes,
   David
   --
   The Smokehouse,
   6 Whitwell Road,
   Norwich, NR1 4HB
   England.
   Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
   Website: [2][5]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk
   --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [3][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   --
   References
   1. [7]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
   2. [8]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
   3. [9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

References

   1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. mailto:da...@vanedwards.co.uk
   3. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
   5. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/
   7. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
   8. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
   9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/

Reply via email to