A late response to this thread, but I found this discussion/article; http://www.viewzone.com/432hertz222.html
Not all that scientific, I don't think, but there's information to think about. Regards, Leonard Williams On 12/12/15, 12:21 PM, "Edward Martin" <lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu on behalf of edvihuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nice article, Ron. > I agree, in that there is no definitive pitch. We seem to have > settled on 440 vs. 415 as standards of modern vs baroque, but what > about 460, or 392? With the lute, a few sources state to tune the > treble to just before it breaks, and that is where one starts. > I am wondering, has anybody on the list read some of the arguments > about changing the modern pitch standard as a + 432? > ed > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Ron Andrico <[1]praelu...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > We have posted our Saturday morning quotations, this week on pitch > standards. > [1][2]http://wp.me/p15OyV-1qB > Ron & Donna > -- > References > 1. [3]http://wp.me/p15OyV-1qB > To get on or off this list see list information at > [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > -- > >References > > 1. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com > 2. http://wp.me/p15OyV-1qB > 3. http://wp.me/p15OyV-1qB > 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >
