On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Christoph Wickert <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Kaleb:
>
>
> > Sure, it's right here:
> >
> >
> >
> http://dev.unity-linux.org/projects/unitylinux/repository/revisions/4115/entry/packages/libfm/F/libfm.spec
>
> About which version are we talking now? The subject of the mail reads
> 0.1.9, but the spec says it's libfm-HEAD.tar.xz. If you are using a git
> version, you should at least provide the git version in the spec, not
> only gitdate.
>
> Last but not least I suggest using
> make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> instead of %makeinstall.
>
> BTW: You are not owning the directories
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/ui/
> %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/%{name}/
> %{_libdir}/%{name}/
> %{_includedir}/%{name} and
> %{_includedir}/%{name}/%{name} (new location in 0.1.9)
> this means users will have a couple of empty folders after uninstalling
> the package.
>
> You might want to take a look at
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libfm/devel/libfm.spec?view=markup
> for reference.
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
Thanks for your suggestion. The spec file in our SVN isn't quite the same as
what I'm working with, but the changes I've made are very minimal. I am
working with the 0.1.9 release tarball at the moment, not a GIT snapshot. I
will give your suggestion a try.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
