On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Mike Castle wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 08:42:29AM -0500, T.E.Dickey wrote:
> > (I'd like to entirely disentangle PDCURSES, NCURSES, but don't want to
> > hold up 2.8.3 for that - it's something that I work on when I happen
> > to think about when working on the win32 port).
>
> How about getting rid of slang?
>
> As was mentioned on the list before, slang supports regular curses
> interface these days, and there is even a bit of code that hangs around
> slang just for the sole purpose of supporting lynx. And I was under the
> impression that that is the new recommended way of using slang.
I'm very opposite to this. There are a lot of bugs in the PDCurses for DOS
code, while slang for DOS seem to be bugfree (I haven't seen bugs in it yet).
> mrc
> --
> Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
> www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
> We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
>
Best regards,
-Vlad
