> I'm very opposite to this. There are a lot of bugs in the PDCurses for DOS > code, while slang for DOS seem to be bugfree (I haven't seen bugs in it yet). perhaps (but I haven't the patience to make slang for win32 build, let alone test it - and PDCurses works without problem there). -- I haven't looked at PDCurses for DOS (djgpp) since last year, when I tried building that version & could not locally test because it insisted that I supply it with a packet driver. > -Vlad -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) Mike Castle
- lynx-dev use slcurses? (was: corrections (minor)) Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) - message lib Klaus Weide
- lynx-dev Re: dev.23 corrections (minor) - message l... Webmaster Jim
- Re: lynx-dev Re: dev.23 corrections (minor) - m... Klaus Weide
- lynx-dev Re: dev.23 corrections (minor) - m... Webmaster Jim
- lynx-dev version number (was correctio... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Re: dev.23 corrections (m... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev dev.23 corrections (minor) T.E.Dickey
