Re: lynx-dev Re: dev.23 corrections (minor) - message lib

[Klaus Weide]

On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Webmaster Jim wrote:

> > [kw: ...]  Should we encourage
> > translators to update their translations now?  How?
> 
> This is an unfortunate side effect of Lynx being numbered in a different
> style than other software, which caused the language coordinator to
> assign 2.8.3 to the 2.8.2 message file. I am cc'ing Fran�ois Pinard so
> he can forward this to the teams.
> 
> We have provided a URL for the translation teams to pick up the
> developing version with a GNU-based subdirectory scheme, but I'm not
> aware this has been adopted.

Cuuld you explain this sentence?  Especially, what is a "GNU-based
subdirectory scheme"?

   Klaus