>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Thursday 14 September 2006 10:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> José> PS: Jean-Marc as you can see in the first link, unicode supports José> composition , what you would expect from unicodeaccent. :-) >> OK, so we could have an insetunicodecomposer or whatever name. I >> think whatever is logically a single entity (character?) should be >> seen by the kernel as one character. José> A grapheme, you mean. :-) Lars propose to deal with code José> points. Yes, now that I have read your python document, I know it is a grapheme... José> In what case(s) do you expect the kernel needs to know about José> graphemes and not code points? My question is the opposite: when do we need code points? José> Are those cases relevant? I am not sure I am just asking. :-) I do not know; it is Lars' python code that generate them. I they are just an exception, I'd rather stick them into an inset to avoid reworking the whole kernel around this exception. JMarc
