>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am not so sure. You are saying one-glyph one element in the Lars> kernel. I say one grapheme one element. This is relevant to cursor movement at least. Lars> Then we need the full unicode machinery in the kernel and not Lars> just in the frontends. (think arabic and ligatures, you are in Lars> for a rough ride.) Assuming ligatures looks loosely like the "fi" we know about, this should indeed be done in the kernel. It is just on screen presentation. Lars> IMHO the kernel should _only_ concern itself with codepoints, Lars> not glyphs. Aren't graphemes somewhere between the two? I would say: * e+' : code points * é: grapheme * é or fi: glyphs JMarc
