On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:56:20AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Friday 15 September 2006 11:48, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > Just a small precision: this does not mean that we don't have to be > > source incompatible with Qt4.0. This is an entirely different question > > that needs to be weighted against Qt4.2 new features. > > Is thus 4.1.2 or 4.1.3 a good starting point? I mean, the minimum version we > guarantee that works reasonably with qt4. > The new version will (hopefully) work better but we could require one of > those as the minimum. Is this a reasonable compromise? It would be fine with me. To make LyX catch up with any Qt 4 release in the sense of 'using availabe features when they make sense' would take quite a while anyway.
Andre'
