On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:34:41AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Friday 15 September 2006 09:23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>>>> writes: > > >> > > >> What is this good enough version, BTW? 4.1.0? > > > > Andre> 4.0.2 is the first version I'd consider usable for the kind of > > Andre> stuff LyX uses. > > > > Very good news. Abdel, it would be nice to refrain from using stuff > > not available in 4.0, unless of course there is a real problem. We > > have to define a minimal version and stick to it. > > Is it the first version generally available? > > We should try to see what is that version and use it. I don't think that Qt > 4.0 qualifies for the role, but I could be wrong. I remember André > complaining that 4.0.0 was a beta version disguised.
I still think so. However note that my area of interest in Qt functionality differs quite a bit from what's needed for LyX and I've never evaluated Qt 4.0.{0,1} from a LyX perspective. Andre'