On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:34:41AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 15 September 2006 09:23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>> writes:
> > >>
> > >> What is this good enough version, BTW? 4.1.0?
> >
> > Andre> 4.0.2 is the first version I'd consider usable for the kind of
> > Andre> stuff LyX uses.
> >
> > Very good news. Abdel, it would be nice to refrain from using stuff
> > not available in 4.0, unless of course there is a real problem. We
> > have to define a minimal version and stick to it.
>
> Is it the first version generally available?
>
> We should try to see what is that version and use it. I don't think that Qt
> 4.0 qualifies for the role, but I could be wrong. I remember André
> complaining that 4.0.0 was a beta version disguised.
I still think so.
However note that my area of interest in Qt functionality differs quite
a bit from what's needed for LyX and I've never evaluated Qt 4.0.{0,1}
from a LyX perspective.
Andre'
