>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The next question: The clipboard stack is not really a "paste >> recent" stack: If you copy something in LyX without pasting it is >> nevertheless added, and anything that is pasted but comes from >> outside (selection or clipboard) is not added. That means that it >> is a bit inconsistent. To make it consistent, we could decouple the >> stack from the clipboard and always fill it on paste. The only >> disadvantage I see in doing so is that items that you only copy do >> not appear anymore in the stack. Opinions? Abdelrazak> IMHO, what is important is what you paste not what you Abdelrazak> copy. So I think "paste recent" should only present what Abdelrazak> have been pasted recently regardless of what has been Abdelrazak> copied. I often change my mind when I hit C-c and I don't Abdelrazak> want all those tentative to show up in the menu. So I'd Abdelrazak> say decouple. I like the current behaviour personally. It may need a rename, but I do not think it is wrong. >> Fake X selection for windows and Mac: The patch I originally sent >> is not needed anymore if the patch x.diff in this message is >> applied, since then the internal selection is always used if >> available. If we want to paste the clipboard with the middle mouse >> button on systems that don't have a selection then we should do it >> like the patch fake-selection.diff. This is against the "simple >> mental model" of the selection, so I don't like it, but if windows >> users agree that this is useful I won't object. Abdelrazak> I personally like it and I am sure others will (and Enrico Abdelrazak> will be the first ;-)). But I could live without and just Abdelrazak> using mouse-click plus Ctrl-v. The real native method is selection drag-and-drop on windows, isn't it? JMarc
