Martin Vermeer wrote: > I gained some new understandings from this discussion. If > others did too and act on it, it will make a difference: > > - The difference between pre-existing and user-creatable > semantics, special status of emphasis (Dov) > - But 'Noun' is more natural as an inset charstyle > - A 'strong' style similar to 'emph' in range mode is needed > - Jurgen's idea: a combobox for inset charstyles, including > a remove/none item, probably based on dissolve > - What to do with 'code'? More thinking needed. We have LyXCode > - What about the ambiguity in the Emph toggle? Do we mean > to make a non-emph hole, or an emph-within-emph? And does > the latter require an inset-emph after all? > > Those are my thoughts on this.
Even though I do not agree 100% with all of it, I think this is a good base for the actual implementation (if we stick with the inset ui, that is). Jürgen
