Tetsuya Makimura wrote: > > Well, that patch addresses a different problem, and I'd like to keep the > > patches separate, if possible. > > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4700 ? > I have just noticed it today while reading a post by Abdelrazak > Younes. The patch ID(2678) was not enough for me.
So what's missing? > > Also, they all refer to the same kind of "japanese" support (i.e., > > non-CJK support). > > Today, it is true. But maybe not in the near future; It's > difficult to keep up with the original latex system using pLaTeX, > and we have several latex candidates other than pLaTeX. We'll see then. Jürgen
