Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Konrad Hofbauer wrote:


I (sort of) came to the conclusion though that it is too late for 1.6 anyhow (especially in terms of documentation). Am I right with that?

No idea about that, but the documentation could certainly be an issue.

In general, I think we should be careful about changing the menu structure, and also that we should have good reasons for the changes. In a perfect world, we'd even document _why_ we do the changes.

It will need a VERY detailed WHY, to get any approval/consensus even here on the devel-list, only.

I haven't followed this thread, so the following idea has probably already been raised, but just in case it hasn't: I think it'd be a good idea to ask users for feedback on the menu structure.

Indeed.

Maybe by releasing a separate "version" of LyX so that users can actually test it. Or by presenting the structures (old, new1, new2 etc) to a wider range of users as menu trees or something.

If it's only a matter of changing the menu configuration file[*], you could publish that file on the users' list and ask for feedback.

Yes. It only needs change of the menu configuration file, so we could do that. (Hmm... some things are hard-coded though, I believe.)

Cheers,
Konrad (off for lunch to Quantum)

Reply via email to