On 15 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars does this guideline also apply to trivial functions like : > | > | do_something() { > | do_it_now(); > | done = 1; > | } > > In principle yes, but often those kind of methods are so trivial that > they are "obviouly correct". The problem with inlined code is that it > is so hard to debug. > > Lgb > Right, thanks fro the clarification, this makes sense to me. john -- "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent." - Wittgenstein
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Lior Silberman
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Baruch Even
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonG... Juergen Vigna
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... John Levon
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compiling LyX using Ath... John Levon
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Allan Rae
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Baruch Even
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC John Levon
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC John Levon
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Juergen Vigna
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Angus Leeming
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC John Levon
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonGCC Juergen Vigna
- Re: Compiling LyX using AthlonG... Lars Gullik Bjønnes