On 13/03/2012 8:13 PM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
But why?

This is the perfect case for a separate repo.

> [...]
>
| Assuming that the pristinity of the lyx repo as a whole is so
| important that we cannot allow trusted developers to create branches,
| then maybe such branches can be allowed in the lyx-staging repo? Can
| we have branches in this one, please?

That would be better, but I do not understand why you couldn't have this
in your own repo.


And I don't understand why we couldn't have branches in our repo.

I want it simple, and I want it centralized. It's nice to allow private new repos to developers, thank you for that, but it seems overkill to require their use. I honestly cannot be bothered at the moment to setup remote repositories to fetch someone else's latest feature branch, let alone setup my own copy of the repo on the server. I'm looking for a central place to have access and contribute to the latest LyX development. (I'm also looking for a tool that is stupid easy to use.) I hope that if it's not lyx.git, then please let lyx-staging.git be this central place. Then it would be the main LyX repo in my mind.

Anyway, that's just me. I'm curious to hear what others have to say.

Thanks for your replies and your time.
Regards,
Julien

Reply via email to